Wrapup US Senate agrees climate change is real—but not necessarily that humans

first_imgNearly all U.S. senators agreed today on a measure affirming that climate change is real and not a hoax—including, to the surprise of many observers, Senator James Inhofe (R–OK), the man who once declared global warming a hoax. Meanwhile, although two other measures stating that humans are contributing to climate change won a majority of votes from the 99 senators present, they failed to garner the 60 votes needed to be adopted by the Senate.All three measures were offered as amendments to legislation that would approve the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, which could carry crude oil from Canada’s oil sands to the United States.By a 98 to 1 vote, the U.S. Senate approved Senator Sheldon Whitehouse’s (D–RI) amendment that asked simply whether it is “the sense of the Senate that climate change is real and not a hoax.” The only senator voting no was Roger Wicker (R–MS). Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Emailcenter_img Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) Whitehouse’s amendment takes an implicit jab at Inhofe for his past statements. Like other Democrats, Whitehouse was seeking a vote that would serve as a first step toward future climate policy action. “I’m hoping that after many years of darkness and blockade that this vote can be a first little beam of light through the wall that will at least allow us to start having an honest conversation about what carbon pollution is doing to our climate and to our oceans,” Whitehouse said just before the vote on his amendment.Then, courtesy of Inhofe, some political theatrics ensued on the Senate floor. To many observers’ surprise, Inhofe announced he wanted to be a co-sponsor on the Whitehouse amendment, eliciting gasps and scattered applause from the chamber. Inhofe, who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and has promised to try to block many Obama administration environmental initiatives, declared his support for the amendment—but perhaps not in the way climate activists hoped he would. He said that climate change itself is not a hoax, but that “the hoax is that there are some people who are so arrogant to think that they are so powerful to think they can change climate,” Inhofe said. Inhofe then joined 97 of his colleagues in voting yes on the Whitehouse amendment.Votes on two other measures declaring that humans are changing the climate were much closer.Senator John Hoeven (R–ND) offered an amendment affirming that climate change is real and humans are contributing to it. But it also included the State Department’s finding that the Keystone XL pipeline wouldn’t significantly worsen climate change, a provision likely meant to entice moderate Republicans into supporting the measure. In the end, the vote was 59 to 40 in favor, one shy of the 60 needed for adoption.Hoeven’s measure was seeking to serve as a more GOP-friendly alternative to a third climate amendment from Senator Brian Schatz (D–HI). Schatz’s measure asked whether it’s the “sense of Congress” that “climate change is real” and that “human activity significantly contributes to climate change.” It also failed to reach the 60 vote threshold, on a vote of 50 to 49.Senator Lisa Murkowski (R–AK), chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said that she backed Hoeven’s amendment but would vote against Schatz’s amendment because its wording—that humans are “significantly” changing the climate—was stronger than the wording in Hoeven’s.Meanwhile, many Democrats supported Hoeven’s amendment despite its inclusion of the Keystone XL language. Senator Barbara Boxer (D–CA), top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said a yes vote on Hoeven’s measure didn’t necessarily mean endorsing the State Department’s findings about the pipeline’s climate impact. She urged a yes vote on the amendment because an acknowledgment by the Senate that humans are changing the climate would have served as “breakthrough in the climate debate. … What a breath of fresh air this amendment is,” Boxer said.Even though the two amendments that clarified that the Senate agrees humans are changing the climate fell short of adoption, Senator Bernie Sanders (I–VT) still sees the votes as a victory. “I think this is a significant step forward, and I think in the months and years to come more and more Republicans will accept that position,” Sanders said after the vote.Sanders is sponsoring a climate amendment of his own, which would specify not only that humans are changing the climate but also that climate change is already having major impacts and that society should take steps to clean up its energy supply. It’s unclear whether that amendment will get a vote.Inhofe, meanwhile, indicated after the vote that he would unleash a “truth squad” to examine the science of humanmade climate change, which he says liberals want to use to justify tax increases. “We’re going to have hearings with prominent scientists to come in and talk about this thing,” he said, “because all they say now is, ‘Oh, the science is settled.’ ”last_img read more